Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  588 / 1029 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 588 / 1029 Next Page
Page Background

Caricchia et al. / Qualità dell’ambiente urbano – XI Rapporto (2015)

ISPRA Stato dell’Ambiente 63/15 pagg. 504-546

505

Abstract

Air pollution is a key topics, due to the relevance of related health and environmental

risks.

This chapter shows the urban air quality related indices, based on observed levels in

2014, compared with the limit and objective values imposed by the legislation in

force.

A preliminary 2015 air quality assessment was also shown, related only to the first

six month PM10 daily exceedances, and to the summer ozone.

The analysis was based on the statistics provided by the ARPA/APPA; the synthetic

indices reported here were elaborated by ISPRA.

Results shown that the benzene, arsenicum, cadmium and nickel limit (annual mean)

were never exceeded, confirming the previous year observations.

Besides there were only a few exception to a complete attainment for PM2.5

(annual

mean exceeded in Milano) and for benzo(a)pirene (exceedances recorded in Torino,

Bolzano and Terni, other than Milano).

Regarding the PM10 daily limit a larger number of exceedances were found (30 non

attainment urban areas): among these, 18 already exceed the limit value as the

2015 first six month assessment. Moreover NO

2

annual limit exceedance was

recorded in 20 cities, at least from one monitoring station and the ozone long term

objective was largely unattained in 2014 as well as in 2015.

As a whole the distance to the EU limit and target values continued to be large.

In this context it is worthwhile to note a general air quality improvement in 2014

compared to the previous years. This qualitative observation seems in agreement

with the quantitative trend analysis carried out recently on long term air pollution

time series in Italy (ISPRA 2014), though it should be noted that the natural inter-

annual variability in the meteorological condition, favoring more or less the pollutants

dispersion, could be the main reason for the relatively low level observed in 2014.

Keywords

Urban air quality, Monitoring, Air pollution